Ancient Clan


Main Menu
Home
Forums
Reviews
Search Archive
 
-- Ancient Clan
Site News and Updates
Forum FAQ
Reviews
 
-- General
News Column
Random
 
-- Anime
Anime / Animation / Manga / Comics
Naruto
Bleach
One Piece
Yu Yu Hakusho
InuYasha
Gundam
 
-- Games
Games
Xenosaga
Final Fantasy
The Legend of Zelda
Role Playing
 
-- Tinsel Town
Movies, TV & Books
Battlestar Galactica
Stargate
Star Wars
 
-- Discussion
Rants and Raves / Issues
Humor
Music
Computers
 
-- Events
 
-- Contests!
Accounts
Sigs / Avatars
E-Mail




Home arrow News Column arrow Pop star acquitted of all charges in molestation case











Pop star acquitted of all charges in molestation case PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ladywriter   
Sunday, 15 April 2007
Ladywriter
June 14th, 2005, 08:21 AM
SANTA MARIA, California (CNN) -- A stoic Michael Jackson walked out of court acquitted by jurors who said they didn't have enough evidence to convict him of molestation charges that could have sent him to prison for years.

Jackson made no comment -- and didn't even smile -- as he left the Santa Maria courthouse after the verdict Monday, surrounded by his parents and siblings.

He did wave and blow kisses to hundreds of supporters, who screamed, hugged one another and threw confetti when they heard the news -- some of them overcome with tears of joy. (Fans react (http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/13/jackson.trial.reaction.ap/index.html))

Jackson's brother, Jermaine, told CNN's "Larry King Live" his family was "very, very happy."

"Like we always felt from the very beginning and knew, he was one thousand percent innocent," he said. "It takes one person to tell the truth, but it takes many to concoct a lie."

Jackson was accused of molesting a 13-year-old boy two years ago when they were sleeping alone together in his bed at Neverland Ranch in Santa Barbara County. (Verdict list (javascript:CNN_openPopup('/interactive/law/0506/interactive.jackson.verdict/list.html','620x430','toolbar=no,location=no,direc tories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=no,resiz able=no,width=620,height=430');))

The jury acquitted Jackson on 10 counts:



<LI>Four counts of committing a lewd act with a child.



<LI>One count of attempting to commit a lewd act on a child younger than 14.



<LI>One count of conspiracy to commit false imprisonment, extortion and child abduction.



<LI>Four counts of providing alcohol to a minor to facilitate child molestation.

Santa Barbara County District Attorney Thomas Sneddon, who sat grim-faced as the court clerk read out the verdicts, later told reporters he would accept the decision.

"In 37 years [as a prosecutor], I've never quarreled with a jury's verdict, and I'm not going to start today," he said.

Asked if he thought the jury had just acquitted a child molester, Sneddon said, "No comment."

Jackson's lead defense attorney, Thomas Mesereau Jr., told reporters on his way out of the courthouse that "justice was done."

"The man's innocent. He always was," Mesereau said.

Jury retrospective

The jury foreman, Paul Rodriguez, said jurors were "very troubled" that Jackson, by his own admission, had overnight sleepovers with children in his bed.

But Rodriguez, a 63-year-old retired high school counselor from Santa Maria, said jurors were instructed by the judge to base their verdicts on the facts of the case, not "our beliefs or our own personal thoughts."

"We would hope ... that he doesn't sleep with children anymore," Rodriguez said on CNN. "He just has to be careful how he conducts himself around children."

At a post-verdict news conference, jurors said that after more than 32 hours of deliberations over seven days, they all agreed prosecutors had simply not proved their case against the pop star beyond a reasonable doubt.

At the news conference, jurors were identified only by their seat number in the courtroom.

"We actually challenged one another in the deliberation room," said Juror No. 1, a 62-year-old man from Santa Maria, later identified as Raymond Hultman. "We challenged the issues, and we came to the decision that pointed to reasonable doubt."

Later, in an interview on "Larry King Live," Hultman said he believes Jackson "probably has molested boys."

"I can't believe that this man could sleep in the same bedroom for 365 straight days and not do something more than just watch television and eat popcorn," he said. "I mean that doesn't make sense to me, but that doesn't make him guilty of the charges that were presented in this case and that's where we had to make our decision."

As they deliberated, jurors kept coming back to the "closetful of evidence" supplied by prosecutors during the 14-week trial, but "it was just not enough," said Juror No. 10, a 45-year-old woman from Solvang, not far from Jackson's Neverland Ranch.

"We expected probably better evidence, something that was a little more convincing. And it just wasn't there," she said.

Rodriguez said jurors did find credible some of the testimony relating to past child molestation allegations against Jackson, which prosecutors were allowed to introduce to try to prove a pattern of behavior.

But he said that testimony wasn't enough to overcome the jury's doubts about the facts in current case.

Juror No. 8, a 42-year-old woman from Lompoc who cried during the reading of the verdict, said the jury's decision was emotional for her because it was "a no-win situation for the [accuser's] family and Michael Jackson."

"But we had to do what we were instructed to do," she said.

During the trial, Jackson's defense team attacked the credibility of Jackson's teenage accuser and his family, particularly the boy's mother.

The jurors, who listened to the mother for more than five days, indicated that they, too, doubted her credibility and were put off by the way she directly addressed jurors and accented her testimony by snapping her fingers.

"I disliked it intensely," said Juror No. 5, a 79-year-old woman from Santa Maria. "I thought, 'Don't snap your fingers at me, lady.' "

Juror No. 10 said "you couldn't help but wonder" whether the mother concocted the charges against Jackson and coached her children to lie, as the defense alleged.

The juror said that as a mother she was also troubled by the fact the accuser's mother allowed her son to sleep alone with Jackson.

"What mother in her right mind would allow that to happen -- just freely volunteer your child to sleep with someone?" she said.

As for the testimony of the boy himself, Rodriguez said jurors were troubled by the fact that the youngster's version of events was inconsistent with testimony offered by other members of his family.

"It was really hard to believe what he was telling us," he said.

Jurors said they also were troubled by the logic of the prosecution's timeline.

Prosecutors said the molestation took place about three weeks after Jackson and his associates allegedly launched a conspiracy against the family to enlist their help in damage control efforts after the boy was shown holding hands with the entertainer in an unflattering television documentary.

Jurors apparently also discounted the cache of sexually explicit material seized from Neverland and presented by prosecutors, who argued the material was used by Jackson to help groom young boys for abuse.

"Those are adult magazines. Anybody can own them," Rodriguez said. "It doesn't prove the charge."

Sneddon defends case

Debra Opri, a Jackson family attorney, said prosecutors made a mistake when "they brought charges against Michael Jackson with the wrong accuser."

Sneddon defended his decision to proceed with the case, saying prosecutors don't have the luxury of picking the victims they represent.

"When a victim comes in and the victim tells you they've been victimized, and you believe that and you believe the evidence supports that, you don't look at their pedigree," Sneddon said. "We did the right thing for the right reasons."

Sneddon said that despite Monday's verdict, he "probably wouldn't" shy away from pursuing new allegations against Jackson if law enforcement had a good case against him.

"We'd review it like any other case," he said.

The jury's verdict was read shortly after 2 p.m. (5 p.m. ET), about 90 minutes after jurors informed Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville that they had reached a decision.

The reading of the verdict was delayed to give Jackson time to drive from Neverland to the courthouse in Santa Maria.

Jackson looked straight ahead and showed little reaction as he listened to the court clerk go through the not guilty verdicts on all 10 counts. (On the Scene (http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/13/otsc.dornin/index.html))

His mother, Katherine, who attended every day of the trial, started to cry as his siblings LaToya, Tito and Randy held her. His father, Joseph, sat with his hands clasped in front of him.

After Melville told Jackson he was free to go, the entertainer hugged his attorneys before walking out of the courthouse and getting in a black SUV for the return trip to Neverland.
<LI> http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/14/jackson.trial/index.html

Vincent
June 14th, 2005, 10:59 AM
hooray for jackson. i'm glad that he was found not guilty, but i think there were some charges that he's actually guilty for. he's just too weird...

Dubird
June 14th, 2005, 12:37 PM
it's the "Shadow of a doubt" that freed him....i don't really know enough about the case to decide for myself....but if you're going to convict someone of something so bad, it better be beyound a shadow of a doubt.....if i wasn';t sure, i wouldn't want to send someone to jail when there's a chance that he is innocent.....*shrugs*.....at the very least, i hope he learned his lesson.....

Vincent
June 14th, 2005, 03:38 PM
the family that brought him to court weren't all that innocent either. the mom's been accused several times of using her son (who has cancer) as a tool to get money from people. and once they sued JC Penny but before the trial started, the parents put the two children in acting classes....

Tanoro
June 14th, 2005, 03:52 PM
Sadly, I wasn't on Jackson's side on this case. I think this is the OJ Simpson trial all over again.

BlitzZ
June 14th, 2005, 09:57 PM
Sadly, I wasn't on Jackson's side on this case. I think this is the OJ Simpson trial all over again.
I agree with that. If another (credible) family pressed charges against Jackson he probably would of been guilty. (IMO)

slippers
June 14th, 2005, 11:15 PM
i dont think it's that simple. what's the statute of limitation on molestation in cali anyway? one juror believe that jacko did molest other boys in the past, but it would be pointless to persue it now(ex."it's all about money"). method(pure allegations without facts) used were same as peterson case but results came out different because one was high profiler and the other was not. robert blake anyone?

DeathscytheX
June 15th, 2005, 12:05 AM
Jackson is a freak that never grew up in his head because his Dad basically took away his childhood. hes still a kid in his brain so he sees nothing wrong with sleeping in the same bed with other kids. I don't like the guy as much as the next person these days but just because hes a freak doesn't mean he did it.

The dude is whack but I doubt he molested anyone. Just look at the Mother of this child... she's the type of person I completely despise.. always trying to get money for nothing (she has a nice little history of it too). She ranks up there with the morbidly obese shit heads that sue mcdonalds because they there to damn lazy to go exercise and eat right. Its people like her that let you enjoy the most ridiculous warning label of them all: Just take a look at any bottled soft drink product... "WARNING CONTENTS UNDER PRESSURE. CAP MAY BLOW OFF CAUSING EYE OR OTHER SERIOUS INJURY. POINT AWAY FROM FACE AND PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY WHEN OPENING." Yup we can thank idoits like her for things like these.

Yeah this is the 2nd time this has happend to Jacko. I doubt the 1st time was real also. If MJ was a child molester, ud think plenty more people would step out... since he does interact with A LOT of children. It hasnt happend, and until it does I will continue to believe what I do.

Vincent
June 15th, 2005, 12:56 AM
he just released a statement saying that he will no longer allow children to sleep in his bedroom anymore. bout time :nod:

Mibu_Kyoshiro
June 15th, 2005, 05:47 AM
he just released a statement saying that he will no longer allow children to sleep in his bedroom anymore. bout time :nod:

Now he just has to stop passing out the Jesus Juice...


Anyway, did anyone see the Triumph the Comic Dog bit outside of the Jackson trial? It has to be one of the funniest things I've ever heard. If you find you can download it somewhere, I suggest you do it.

Westonian
June 15th, 2005, 08:33 AM
He's still guilty for turning a black man unholy white. I'm not even that white. I guess I just don't care about the official charges anymore. It's all happened before. It's just because he was a celebrity that they made the huge fuss about it. From what I heard, the mother was sue-happy too.

Camron
June 15th, 2005, 10:31 AM
Vitiligo ... look it up.

DeathscytheX
June 15th, 2005, 11:33 AM
Even if he did get convicted he would have gotten off with 1 year at cup cake farm and a year of house arrest at worst. So its not like it would have done any good.

Martha Stewart should be rotting in prison, but celebrities are above justice.

Westonian
June 15th, 2005, 01:24 PM
I think celebrity's actually enjoy prison. I'll elaborate later.

slippers
June 15th, 2005, 04:04 PM
Letterman said ... " This just in. Saddam Hussein requests that his trial be moved to Santa Maria CA. " ... well I thought it was funny.

haha. :spit:

Sledgstone
June 15th, 2005, 10:50 PM
i could have sworn michael jackson was going to go to jail for one of those charges.. i figured if martha stewart could go to jail, anyone could go to jail.. but i guess michael jackson is of a higher calibur celebrity. -_-;

eh, i remember a dave chappell skit, it went something like this..

lawyer: "is michael jackson guilty?"
dave: "no! hes just a confused man."
lawyer: "so its acceptable for him to sleep with children?"
dave: "of course, hes just a child at heart."
lawyer: "so its acceptable for him to sleep with your children?"
dave: "HELL NO! are you crazy!?"

X'D

DeathscytheX
June 16th, 2005, 12:02 AM
X'D that was one of the best skits ever.

xelloss
June 16th, 2005, 12:31 AM
dave chappell is the shit. that one.. and the nigger family X'D ....

i think jacko is a freak.. i think he did it. someone that mentally and emotionally abused has to get kicks off of something.. i think he choses paticular boys.. thats why you dont hear it much. but thats my opinion.

Westonian
June 16th, 2005, 08:24 AM
SO many clebrities get caught by the police for the stupid stuff they do. I really think they try to get caught as a publicity stunt so they can get more media coverage. They don't care how they get on camera, just as long as they can so the States see them. Of course that is just an ignorant speculation.

GundamFreakX
June 22nd, 2005, 04:56 PM
I'm glad he was found innocent. I've always liked Michael Jackson, not for hisself but for his music. However, he's just too nice a man to receive the guilty charge for such stupid excuses for money. He just received what he was supposed to in the first place: innocent. Although he does look TOO white, and kinda freaks me out with his nose, I have no right to press such horrific charges. That was probably why they did it. Or, they just wanted money. Either way, they lost. HA!

 
< Prev   Next >




Network
Ancient Clan
Hosting
Wind Scar
Death by Gundam
Network
Gallery
Forums
Classic Archives
Forums Login:
Latest Posts:



© 2005 Ancient Clan
| Home | Legal | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |